Create account

Coastal Position

Variable COAST of ten · scored for every 1 km site


Land beside the sea is worth more than the same land ten kilometres inland — and worth nothing at all if the sea is coming for it.

Eight of the ten variables measure what ground can do: grow, carry traffic, hold water, yield minerals, house people. None of them could see the thing that makes a dry headland above a bay worth more than a better farm behind it. A dry coastal tile and an inland tile with the same farmland, roads and water scored the same, and the coast read as the weakest ground in its region for lacking what it was never meant to have.

Coastal position is that missing measurement, built from two facts and nothing else: how far the sea is, and whether the sea is projected to stay where it is.

What it measures

The distance from the centre of a 1 km site to the nearest ground the sea covers today, and whether the site’s ground stands clear of the sea for good: above the high end of the worst projected rise a century and a quarter out, with two metres to spare for tide and storm. The shoreline is the one the sea-level view beside the Index draws.

The gate, and why it is not the score

It is tempting to score coastal land on elevation alone — high enough to stay dry, score high. That carries almost no information. In one Pacific canton of 1,572 sites, 1,546 sit above the highest projected reach; a score built on “not flooded” would separate twenty-six sites from the rest and say nothing about the rest, which is where all the ranking happens.

So elevation is the gate, not the signal. It decides whether a coastal site is allowed to have a coastal position at all. Distance is the signal.

How the number is built

  1. The sea today. Open sea only: the sites the sea-level model calls wet now that are also ocean, not a tidal river or a marsh reaching upriver. A tidal river can run wet fifty kilometres inland to the first dam; ground beside it is riverside, not coastal. The edges of the open sea are the shoreline.
  2. Distance. From the site’s centre to the nearest such site, in metres. A site on the shore scores 100; the score falls in a straight line to 0 at five kilometres inland.
  3. The gate. If the site’s ground sits below the high end of the worst projected rise plus two metres, or the highest scenario on the sea-level view reaches it, it scores 0 whatever its distance. It is coastal and in the sea’s path, and that is a fact about the ground, not an absence of one.
  4. On top, not averaged in. Safe shoreline is the most valuable ground there is, and one variable averaged among ten can only nudge a score. So coastal position is added on top of the Index: up to 30 points on the shore, half that two and a half kilometres back, nothing at the edge of the band. The total never passes 100.
  5. Beyond the band. Past five kilometres a site has no coastal position. Not zero — none — and nothing is added, so inland ground is scored on the other nine exactly as it was before this variable existed. Nothing in Iowa moved.

What scores zero

Coastal ground the sea is projected to reach, judged at the high end with room for tide and storm. And, as a limit, ground exactly five kilometres from the shore.

What is not measured

How to read the score

100A safe site on the shore. Adds 30 points to the Index.
~80A safe site about one kilometre inland — the first row behind the shore at this resolution. Adds about 24.
~50A safe site two and a half kilometres from the sea. Adds 15.
0Coastal ground in the sea’s projected path; or the edge of the band. Adds nothing.
—Inland. No coastal position, and none implied.

Ground published before this variable existed was scored on nine and says so: its model version is stamped on every tile and printed on every study, and those numbers stand as the answer that model gave.

← All ten variables